The 2 reasons why landlords say "no" to housing benefit tenants

 
15 July 2010 | Posted by: Chris | Categories: ARLA... | Comments: 3

From Phillip James Letting Agents in Worthing and Brighton & Hove.

Housing benefit tenants have it tough. There’s no denying that across East and West Sussex it’s hard to find a decent property to rent where the landlord would be happy to accept tenants claiming LHA. Why?

Partly, it comes down to inadequate supply in the rental market. Because of the current lack of supply in the rental market, there are far more tenants looking for property than there are properties to rent. The sales market is slow and the mortgage market is still very restrained; this means that many people who would have bought a property, are now renting. The rental market is flooded with tenants looking for quality housing.

Because there are more tenants around than properties available to rent, landlords and letting agents are quite rightly, selecting the tenants in the best position. And given the choice, landlords would rather rent their properties to people in employment.

Why? Isn’t the rent from a tenant on housing benefit pretty much guaranteed?

No. It’s not.

There are two fundamental flaws with the current LHA system and these are the primary reasons that most landlords will say no to housing benefit tenants. One concerns how the LHA is paid and the other concerns how many local councils treat landlords in the event that a tenant needs to be evicted.

1. How LHA is paid

Under the current system, LHA is paid direct to the tenant, the idea being that the tenant then pays the landlord. This was designed to give a higher degree of responsibility to the tenant as they became more involved in their own financial management.

A laudable aim. But in reality, this system has failed. Many tenants have found they have to ‘dip into’ their LHA funds in order to pay their bills and when the rent becomes due, they don’t have the money to pay.

The landlord then has to wait until the tenant is eight full weeks in rent arrears until the local authority will divert the payments from the tenant to the landlord or letting agent.

2. Evicting a tenant

It is normal practice for notice to be served on a tenant who repeatedly pays their rent late or not at all.

In the event that notice is served on a tenant in receipt of LHA, we have found that our local councils will advise the tenants to “stay put” until a court order for possession is granted. Only then will the council re-house the tenant.

Gaining repossession of a property through the courts is a lengthy and expensive process for landlords. It is unlikely that landlords having to go through this process will want to repeat it.

Summary

Demand is high and supply is low in the rental market. Landlords of quality housing currently have a wide choice of tenants available. They are choosing tenants who are paying the rent with their own means rather than tenants claiming housing benefit.

Although the intention is to benefit the tenants, the rules around Local Housing Allowance are actually harming the tenants by leaving them with far less choice than they would have otherwise.

 

 

 

3 Responses to “The 2 reasons why landlords say "no" to housing benefit tenants”

  1. [...] bit of a mess, with many landlords choosing to shy away from this sector of the rental market (see 2 reasons why landlords say “no” to housing benefit tenants). Now, with the Government’s budget cuts, even more landlords will be turning away housing [...]

  2. a.jackson says:

    we shouldn all be tied with the same brush
    not everyone on hb is irisponsable,scum or disrespectful!!!
    not everyones problems are the same,circumstances do change to no fault of their own!!!!!!

  3. Adrian says:

    WARNING TO LANDLORDS Luton Borough Council seem to think it’s okay to advise Tenants to Ignore 12 month Tenancy agreements, along with Section 21 notices, Court Orders to leave by a set date and of course insist on use of Court Bailiffs BEFORE they will finally re house a tenant.

Leave a Reply

Found this interesting? You may also like these articles...

National Landlords Association

Tenants find it hard to pass Letting Agent checks

Potential tenants wanting to rent a property must have a gross income of at least two and a half times the amount of rent payable (it can be up to three times the rent payable, depending on an individual’s circumstances). For a property with a monthly rent of £800, a potential tenant with a good credit history would need to prove gross annual income of at least £24,000.

Plymouth Based Letting Agent Closes after 12 months

A letting agent in Plymouth stops trading leaving landlords and tenants out of pocket. What can landlords do to protect against their letting agents doing the same?

2012 Olympics Could See a Rise in Short Term Letting

As the world descends on London for the Olympics next year, eager new landlords will be tempted to rent their property on short-term lets. But landlords are being urged to take care and proper advice.

£30 a day: That’s the rise in house prices so far this year!

The average house has increased in price by £30 every day since the beginning of the year. What does this mean for landlords, tenants and the letting industry?

Landlords will benefit from an "end to squatters' rights"

It's one of a landlords worst nightmares to find an empty property suddenly occupied with squatters. Thankfully, this is a relatively rare occurance in the private rental sector but when it does happen, the interests of landlords are not well served by current laws.

Phillip James Letting Agents are the number one letting agents across Sussex.
Image ombudsImage nalsImage arla
Sitemap - Terms & Conditions - Copyright - Disclaimer - Our Privacy Policy

© Phillip James Letting Agents 2013 All rights reserved -